Soup Kitchen Superciliousness

Based on both common perception and the media and cultural narrative, one might think that attitude to the poor is one of the chief markers highlighting the divide between left and right, non-religious and religious. Actually, what we find is that the opposite is true; no other issue reveals our solidarity and affinity with one another than our attitude to the poor.

Let me explain.

The left-wing, the liberal elite and the humanist activists are generally known for their support of the rights and conditions of the poor, whereas the right-wing, the conservative establishment and the religious fundamentalists are known more for their lack of concern and even judgemental attitude towards the poor. So far, so superficial…

Take any individual from any of these groups, however, – take yourself even – and picture the following situation and you will find that the response is indicative of far greater convergence of attitude than the above picture might suggest:

Imagine you have been invited to a soup kitchen and you, being the concerned citizen and philanthropist that you are, readily accept the invitation and turn up ready to help out in any way you can. There is no question, then, of any insincerity here; you go to help out of a genuine desire to help your fellow human beings who happen to find themselves in a worse position than you currently are.

Now, just imagine you have arrived at the soup kitchen, ready to help, only to find that you are being directed to the queue together with ‘the poor’.

You inform the people helping out that you don’t need food; you have actually come to help, there must have been some kind of misunderstanding. They take one look at you and don’t seem to believe you and keep on directing you towards the queue.

You begin to get worried and start to look around for your friend who invited you. You finally find him eating together with some of the poor people and ask him what the dickens is going on. He seems genuinely surprised since he too had invited you for the purpose of ‘receiving’ charity, not doling it out.

You now begin to get angry. The initial surprise has passed but you are now in a state of shock. You are also indignant. Why? Well, the reason you are indignant is because you are being treated like a poor person… and you cannot handle it. You find it humiliating, demeaning and patronising that no one seems to realise or take your word for it that you are actually fairly well-to-do (you’re a hipster for crying out loud!), have no need of their charity and that you have actually come to help.

And THIS is the point where the you reading this story finally understands how the you ‘in’ the story (ie. you yourself) ‘really’ views the poor.

You see, as long as you are the one ‘giving out’ the charity, you are a firm believer in it. You campaign for more of it, you join movements and organisations that support the rights of the poor and you incorporate this positive action into your ideology and argue the case at every opportunity.

Yet when you are treated like a poor person yourself – when it comes to ‘receiving’ charity – you suddenly don’t believe in it anymore. You aren’t prepared to accept it even as a misunderstanding!

The supercilious you pontificating in the soup kitchen has given the game away; you are no less disdainful and dismissive of the poor than the right wing bigot who openly dismisses them as a lost cause and a drain on society.

Deep down, we are all dismissive of the poor for the very simple reason that we are too proud to accept our own poverty when it is presented to us.

And this is exactly what happens when someone – anyone – encounters the gospel.

You see, the gospel comes to tell us that regardless of who we are, what we have done and what we believer, we all exist in a state of absolute spiritual poverty. And whether we are a religious person, counting our good works and faithful religious observance as our riches or a secular person, counting our freedom, education and good works as our riches, the news that we are improverished and in need charity bites and it bites hard.

Since we all like to cling to the idea that we are in some way spiritually/morally rich (or at least middle class), the most normal reaction to hearing the gospel and getting to the heart of it is indignation, even anger.

A true encounter with Jesus Christ is always a traumatic experience precisely because it resembled that experience in the soup kitchen, where we are invited to participate in the work of a great philanthropist who is helping people (the bog-standard perception of Jesus), only to find out that ‘we’ are the ones requiring help.

The helpers in the soup kitchen were directing you to the queue for the poor because all they could see in front of them was someone wearing filthy rags or – perhaps more fittingly – someone completely naked. The gospel proclamation in this sense is like the child in the crowd shouting out to the pompous king who has been sold lies all his life that what he presumes to be a wardrobe of finery and riches is actually a bare-faced lie.

Moreover, the fact that you found your friend – Jesus – eating together with the poor is a detail that completely passed you by. You see, it is only when you identify with the poor that you finally ‘get’ Jesus. It is not enough to help them, you must also see your affinity with them… or else maintain your affinity with your left/right/secular/religious tribe and remain far away from this unique soup kitchen (the gospel) that somehow reveals the shadows of your soul.

But do not fear, for it reveals those shadows not in order to expose them but in order to melt them away.

In the current climate, the soup kitchen motif is not just a clever metaphor, it is a present reality and the difference between life and death for many of my fellow Athenians. Yet let us not miss the deeper lesson that this extremely difficult economic reality is teaching us about our hearts; whatever the economic situation, spiritually you will always remain a beggar in rags, requiring charity but rejecting it out of shame… until you accept the charity of Jesus, the king of all soup kitchens, who came to identify with and dine together with the poor. Only once you have accepted this charity will you be vested with the dignity and the enjoyment of one of the ‘workers’ in the soup kitchen.

God himself wants to meet you in a soup kitchen; but do not look for him amongst the hipster helpers – he is there amongst the poor, inviting you to eat the bread he provides before you roll up your sleeves to offer your help…

God doesn’t hate gays… he hates disdain

At least for homosexuals who don’t believe in God, the critical concern in their contact with Christians who hold to a conservative theology (ie. who don’t believe that same-sex desire/intercourse is part of God’s original plan for creation) is not the question of whether their homosexuality will send them to hell.

Think about it: if they don’t believe that God, heaven or hell exist, then this particular question can’t be a ‘real’ concern that grinds against them and causes their hackles to rise whenever they meet a Christian believer.

No, the real concern (at least in most cases) is surely:

“What is it going to take to get these Christians to quit looking at me and treating me with disdain?”.

While the elevation of the gay issue in society to a human rights issue certainly has the potential to be abused (as we have already seen through the criminal prosecution of many who only reject homosexuality as a matter of conscience and have no thoughts of hatred whatsoever), I am by no means entirely against this elevation. For there are certainly ‘some’ aspects of the historic civil rights struggle which bear upon the gay issue today. I have no doubt, for instance, that the majority of gay people in the erstwhile Christian West have at some point been led in despair to ask the question,

“Am I not a man and a brother?”.

In fact, I would even go so far as to say that – at least in urban culture – it is largely the Christians who fail to grasp the existential significance of this question to a gay population that by any modern standard (and by the Bible’s too for that matter) still experiences social exclusion at the hands of the wider culture.

So while the presenting issue in many instances might be ‘accuracy’ (ie. what does the Bible say or not say on homosexuality?), what people are usually seeking is not accuracy but ‘acceptance’. They want to hear a kind word, some kind of reassurance that despite their same-sex feelings, they can still be accepted by their heterosexual fellow men and women.

Now Christians…

If we have truly understood the gospel then we will know that that kind word – that blessing – can only truly come to someone from the Father, through the Son and by the Spirit… and that no pronouncement we might make either way can condemn or comfort so long as it comes from us.

If we have truly understood the pain and the questions of our fellow human beings then we will seek to answer the question of their heart and their hurt (ie. “am I not a man and a brother?”) before we answer the question of their lips (ie. “surely you don’t believe that homosexuality is wrong?”).

Let me be clear. I am not seeking to sidestep the issue of whether homosexual practice is sinful etc etc. I am simply saying that if Christians at every level of society were able to communicate and demonstrate that they genuinely did not disdain people of other sexual orientation, then not only would this aspect of the culture wars be neutralised, but society as a whole would feel a lot more comfortable in giving us a hearing. If they genuinely felt that we loved them, then they genuinely would want to hear the reasons why theologically conservative Christians continue in the 21st Century to reject homosexuality as a helpful thing for human flourishing.

Even if they remained unconvinced, they could finally agree to disagree with us. It’s not a solution but the tide has to turn somewhere, right?

I write this as a matter of urgency, since in the end the ‘gays’ are not some group of people out there, they are real people. They are you and I and anyone you might speak to, both in church and out of it, who happens to have same-sex feelings. Let us love one another, for truth without love is no truth at all…

Honouring Hitchens

Death is never something to be made light of.

Even – perhaps especially – when an ‘opponent’ of yours dies, it is right to honour their memory. In life, someone may have taken on the role of persistent sparring partner or even sworn enemy but in death they are always your fellow human being.

Less than two years ago I had the honour of watching Christopher Hitchens dismantle a rather bumbling Catholic philosopher at a debate in the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford. At the book-signing afterwards, I brushed past him as he passed by me on a quest for a glass of whiskey; his cancer diagnosis

The hubris of Apple

My devotion to Steve Jobs and all things Apple is well known amongst my friends, family and acquaintances; call it an overflowing of enthusiasm, call it a an character flaw, call it disturbing cultish behaviour, it has been an ever-present part of my life for as long as I remember.

I would like to believe, however, that my devotion, while at times excessive, disturbing and verging on the idolatrous, is not ‘completely’ blind. Take for instance last week’s article in the New Yorker on Apple’s new HQ in Cupertino. It doesn’t take a genius to observe that both in terms of size and design, the whole project smacks of hubris. This hubris of course is built into the company’s self-image at the deepest level, from the allusion to Adam and Eve’s original sin in the logo to the incessant repetition of “i” and “me” in all of their products. There is not even any attempt to disguise it through some sort of illuminati-style symbolism.

Yet this latest plan takes this ostensibly ‘playful’ sales pitch to a slightly more sinister place. One of the

Try and sing your way out of this one

Some stories are as devastating as they are hopeful.

Take the story of Nico, the prisoner endowed with an unspeakably beautiful voice. Every year he appears before the board of the prison and sings for them yet all they can do is

“I see the light”… The Blues Brothers and Free Will

The freedom of the human will “is” a reality… but it is always relative to the domain in which the human subject resides. Thus a sinful human can only choose from amongst a variety of sinful options, for these are the only ones his dominus (the devil) offers. This is why regeneration (the enlightening and animating work of the Holy Spirit) must precede faith in Jesus. (Col 1:13; 2 Cor 4:6; Isa 9:2; Gen 1:3)

The power to choose?

Everyone knows that in real life fairy-tales and politics don’t mix… recent events in the UK notwithstanding. But they should.

To understand why, we need to start a bit further back – with anthropology. Reformed theology regards the Bible’s teaching on anthropology as being reducible to the following idea: since the Fall of humankind into sin, the power of “contrary choice” (the ability to choose between ethically righteous and ethically sinful options) has been taken away and replaced with “alternative choice” (the ability to choose among various sinful ethical options).

This reality is made manifest through our politics.

An exclusive truth

There is a gospel according to Tim. It is might speak about a Christ and his death on a cross for my sake, but it flows from a God created in my image, who conforms to my own sinful likes and dislikes, my flawed personality and my pride-ridden insecurities… and if you follow it, it will send you straight to hell.

There is also a gospel according to (insert your name here). It too will probably speak of a Christ and his death on a cross for your sake, but it will look different to the gospel of Tim. Let’s say that due to my personality, I am the kind of guy who

A primitive truth

Jesus speaks of a basic principle that works in people’s lives:

“Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” (Matt 23:12)

What is he saying here? Simply this – that a false reckoning of oneself (arrogance) leads to humiliation, whereas a right reckoning of oneself (humility) leads to dignity and honour.

This is one of the most primitive truths of the Bible; indeed, when we view it in light of the cross of Christ, it stands as the most fundamental principle of the universe.

Before we get there, however, just to point out the universality of this principle, let us consider

Rejoice you peoples

A rare English sermon – for Easter Sunday.

“The Seed”

I took my dream and spade in hand
I ventured out into the land
To plant it in a special hole
To shore the breaches in my soul

Alas the tree when autumn came
Did no fruit yield of worthy name
Such lifeless buds and bitter taste
Did prompt to burn it down post haste

I savoured thus the burning smells
Of erstwhile idols sent to hell
Now onwards hence I could proceed
With plans afoot for fresh new seeds

The plant which grew up from the ash
Of dreams which had all burned and crashed
Did please indeed, yet for a while
For soon I had no cause to smile

It grew and grew and blocked the light
And turned into a ghastly sight
It drew me up into its arms
And lured me near with deadly charms

The danger I did fail to sense
Until the foliage was so dense
That no way out was to be seen
And none drew near to hear my screams.

Entrenched was I in endless night
With no recourse to change my plight
I served my dreams, those dev’lish thoughts
Which made my paths of no import

Then grazed my ear a foreign sound
A tortured scream though much profound
And at its noise my dreams did fade
As light my darkness now unmade

And in its place a tree of light
Which scattered sweetness o’er the blight
This tree is life and joy and peace
The balm to make the nightmares cease

The seed a man whose dreams were pure
Who did not choose to stay secure
But took my shame and fell to earth
And rose again to give new birth

Ponder anew what the Almighty can do If with His love He befriend thee.

“Forever and Always”

Running, always running
Towards an unlocked gate
Turning, always turning
In trying to thwart my fate

Hiding, always hiding
From monsters in my head
Crying, always crying
To drown this sense of dread

What is true freedom?

In a recent survey conducted in the Law/Economics/Politics Faculty of the University of Athens, an overwhelming majority of students declared that, for them, the greatest value of all was “freedom”.

The immediate difficulty that arises from such a conclusion is the fact that freedom is such a broad term

More Than the Hairs (Hymn)

(To be sung to the melody of “When I Survey”/«Προσβλέπον τον σκληρόν σταυρόν»)

More than the hairs upon my head,
The sinful ways in which I tread
Yet still your mercy never fails;
Your steadfast love, it still prevails.

The piercing of your only Son,
Who not one sin had ever done,
Is life to me; the guilty free;
The righteous stricken on that tree.

I look to self and fain would weep
At my disgrace; it runs so deep.
I look to Christ and praise your name,
For he has covered all my shame.

The rain is coming… (A modern parable)

Unless I go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. When [the Holy Spirit] comes, he will convict the world of guilt in regard to sin and righteousness and judgment. (Jesus in John 16:7-8)

Whether you are a Christian or a non-Christian, it is highly likely that you have been puzzled about the role and significance (if any) of the Holy Spirit in your life

The Shepherd in the Shadow

The shadow comes and casts its blight
Obscuring grace and masking sight
Here in the small hours of the night
Far, far away now seems the light

The sound of weeping in the soul
A filthy sheep lost in a hole;
When least my thoughts I can control
And ne’er my will would be cajoled.

My foes they mock and gather round
The battle lost, the captive bound
The sheep it seems was never found;
The shepherd safe on higher ground?

But wherefore do I now survey
Myself removed and in my place
The selfsame shepherd I betrayed
Yet wearing my disfigured face

The shadow darkens and they flee;
Alone and torn upon that tree,
My shepherd, glorious “I AM HE”,
He pays and dies to set me free

The shepherd never left my side
Though I in selfishness did hide
He stood against the wrathful tide
That I in him may e’er abide

So bleat will I through endless days
In joining with creation’s praise
Exalting him whom God did raise
And glory only in his gaze

“Kiss the Son”

“‘Scuse me, while I kiss the sky.” (Jimi Hendrix)

The average woman or man on the street – upon questioning – has quite a positive picture of Jesus in his or her mind. Surveys usually reveal people’s admiration for his compassion for the poor and downtrodden and his revolutionary teaching in the Sermon on the Mount (“turn the other cheek and all that”).

But when the cross is brought up, this admiration is swiftly transformed into evasiveness, bewilderment and even ridicule. People simply cannot conceive of why, after all the good he has done in his life, Jesus suddenly gets it into his head that he’d like to be noble and try and ‘save us from our sins’. Such ideas as ‘sin’ and ‘propitiation’ are considered barbaric, unworthy and